Skip to main content

Procurement case studies

Real results from UK businesses

  • Real clients, real results
  • Verified savings & metrics
  • Multiple industries

See how we’ve helped businesses like yours reduce procurement costs

From manufacturing to agriculture to construction, Aspire Procurement Solutions delivers measurable results. Here are real examples of cost savings, efficiency improvements, and procurement transformation, with specific numbers, timelines, and outcomes.

Aggregate results across all clients

23%

Average cost reduction

£1.2M+

Total savings delivered

90

Days average to ROI

40%

Reduction in admin time

Examples of our Case Studies by sector


Lincolnshire Manufacturer
£552K Annual Savings Through Supplier Rationalisation

  • 23% Savings
  • Manufacturing
Client Profile
Industry: Manufacturing (precision engineering)
Annual Procurement Spend: £2.4M

Size: 150 employees

Location: Lincolnshire

Turnover: £25m annually

Timeline
Audit Phase
3 weeks
Negotiation Phase
6 weeks
Implementation
8 weeks
Total Duration
4 months
ROI Achieved
90 days from start
Key results
£552K
annual savings
23%
cost reduction
87 → 42
suppliers
40%
less admin time
ROI
2,208%

The challenge

The client had no dedicated procurement function. Purchasing was scattered across departments with each manager maintaining their own supplier relationships. Over time, this resulted in:

  • 87 active suppliers across similar categories (e.g., 12 different metalwork suppliers)
  • No negotiated contracts: mostly verbal agreements or outdated terms from 5+ years ago
  • Zero leverage with suppliers due to fragmented spend
  • Excessive admin burden: multiple invoices, relationships, and quality issues
  • No visibility of total spend or potential savings opportunities
Our approach

Phase 1: Comprehensive Spend Analysis (3 weeks)

  • Analysed 18 months of purchase orders and invoices
  • Categorised spend into 14 major categories
  • Identified £1.8M (75% of spend) with top 15 suppliers
  • Benchmarked current pricing against market rates

Phase 2: Supplier Rationalisation & Negotiation (6 weeks)

  • Consolidated 12 metalwork suppliers to 3 preferred partners
  • Ran competitive tenders for top 5 spend categories
  • Secured volume discounts by consolidating spend
  • Improved payment terms from 30 days to 60–90 days (cashflow benefit)

Phase 3: Implementation & Process Design (8 weeks)

  • Implemented purchase requisition and approval process
  • Created preferred supplier list with negotiated contracts
  • Trained purchasing team on new processes and negotiation basics
  • Set up supplier performance monitoring framework
The results

Financial impact

  • £552,000 annual savings (23% reduction on £2.4M spend)
  • £138,000 cashflow improvement from extended payment terms
  • £25,000 project fee = 2,208% ROI
  • ROI achieved in 90 days from project start

Operational impact

  • 87 → 42 suppliers (52% reduction)
  • 40% reduction in admin time on supplier management
  • Improved delivery performance: preferred suppliers prioritise orders
  • Better quality control: fewer supplier relationships to manage

“Katie’s procurement audit identified over £200,000 in annual savings we had completely missed. The ROI was immediate, and we’ve continued to work with Aspire for ongoing strategic support. Best business decision we made.”

— Operations Director, Manufacturing Company (150 employees)

Agricultural Business
£144K Savings Through Flexible Retainer Model

  • 18% Savings
  • Agriculture
Client Profile
Industry: Agriculture (arable farming)
Annual Procurement Spend: £800k

Size: 45 employees

Location: East Midlands, UK

Turnover: £25m annually

Engagement
Model
Monthly retainer
Fee
£1,800/month (£21,600/year)
Duration
Ongoing (2+ years)
Hours
~15-20 hours/month
Scope
Strategic support + supplier negotiation
Year 1 Results
£144k
annual savings
18%
cost reduction
667%
ROI on retainer
£23K
saved vs. full-time hire
Ongoing
improvements

The challenge

A 45-employee agricultural business needed procurement expertise but couldn’t justify a £45K+ full-time hire. Seasonal purchasing patterns meant workload varied significantly. They were spending £800K annually with no strategic oversight, missing bulk buying opportunities, and paying above-market rates for equipment and supplies.

Our solution

£1,800/month flexible retainer providing:

  • Supplier rationalization and contract negotiation (equipment suppliers, feed, fertilizer, fuel)
  • Seasonal buying strategy: bulk purchases timed with market lows
  • Co-operative buying opportunities with other local farms
  • Monthly strategic reviews and ongoing optimisation
  • Training for farm manager on procurement basics
The results

Financial impact

  • £144,000 savings (18% reduction on £800K spend)
  • £21,600 retainer cost = 667% ROI
  • £23,400 saved vs. £45K full-time procurement manager
  • Senior-level expertise without recruitment, onboarding, benefits

Specific Wins:

  • £42K saved on equipment through better negotiation + timing
  • £38K saved on fertilizer through co-operative bulk buying
  • £28K saved on fuel through annual contract vs. spot purchases
  • £36K saved across feed, supplies, and sundries

“As a small agricultural business, we couldn’t justify a full-time procurement manager. Aspire’s flexible retainer gave us access to senior-level expertise at a fraction of the cost. Highly recommend.”

— Managing Director, Agricultural Business (45 employees)

Construction Firm
£180K Savings on Materials & Subcontractor Management

  • 15% Savings
  • Construction
Client Profile
Industry: Construction (commercial projects)
Annual Procurement Spend: £1.2M

Size: 80 employees

Location: East Midlands, UK

Categories: Materials, subcontractors, equipment hire

Engagement
Model
Project-based
Fee
£8,500
Duration
12 weeks
Scope
Supplier consolidation + negotiation
Focus
Top 10 suppliers (70% of spend)
Results
£180K
annual savings
15%
cost reduction
2,118%
ROI
35 → 22
suppliers
Improved
delivery reliability

The challenge

Project managers were each maintaining their own supplier relationships with no cross-project coordination. This resulted in:

  • Different projects paying different prices for identical materials
  • No consolidated spend leverage with suppliers
  • Subcontractor relationships varied wildly in quality and cost
  • Materials waste from poor coordination and last-minute ordering
Our approach
  • Analyzed 12 months of materials spend across all active projects
  • Created preferred supplier framework for key materials (aggregate, timber, steel, concrete)
  • Negotiated annual contracts with volume-based discounts
  • Implemented subcontractor pre-qualification and performance scoring
  • Set up call-off ordering system to reduce waste and emergency purchases
The results

Financial impact

  • £180,000 annual savings (15% on £1.2M spend)
  • £72K saved on materials through better pricing
  • £58K saved on subcontractors through competitive framework
  • £50K reduced waste through better planning
  • 2,118% ROI on £8,500 project fee

Operational impact

  • 35 → 22 suppliers (37% reduction)
  • Improved delivery reliability – preferred suppliers prioritise
  • Reduced admin – standardised ordering process
  • Better cashflow – extended payment terms with key supplier
  • 2,118% ROI on £8,500 project fee
  • Quality improvements – pre-qualified subcontractors

“Katie doesn’t just provide reports, she executes. She personally negotiated with our top 10 suppliers and delivered real, measurable savings. Professional, knowledgeable, and results-driven.”

— Finance Director, Construction Company

Katie’s Public Sector
Procurement Experience

While client confidentiality prevents sharing specific MOD case studies, Katie’s experience in Ministry of Defence procurement provides unparalleled expertise in:

Compliance & Governance:

  • Analysed 18 months of purchase orders and invoices
  • Categorised spend into 14 major categories
  • Identified £1.8M (75% of spend) with top 15 suppliers
  • Benchmarked current pricing against market rates

Complex Category Management:

  • Consolidated 12 metalwork suppliers to 3 preferred partners
  • Ran competitive tenders for top 5 spend categories
  • Secured volume discounts by consolidating spend
  • Improved payment terms from 30 days to 60–90 days (cashflow benefit)

Common themes across all case studies

Quick ROI

All clients achieved ROI within 90-120 days. Most see savings in the first month as contract renegotiations take effect.

Supplier rationalisation

Reducing supplier count by 30-50% is common. Fewer suppliers means less admin, better leverage, and stronger relationships.

Senior-level engagement

Katie personally manages every client. You get 20+ years’ of experience, not junior consultants learning on your budget.

90

Average Days to ROI

40%

Average Supplier Reduction

100%

Katie’s Direct Involvement

Ready to see similar results in your business?

Book a free consultation to discuss your procurement challenges. We’ll assess your situation and identify potential savings opportunities—with no obligation.